Structured supervision with pre-licensed clinicians
Structure is usually built in with pre-licensed clinicians, as many group practices have licensed supervisors on staff who provide the supervision required for licensure. When these supervisory meetings are already happening consistently and there are goals related to their licensure requirements, it can be fairly simple and expected to have conversations around their performance. Are they meeting their licensure requirements? How are they doing with the performance metrics of the practice? How are their clients doing? Are they needing support anywhere? These are all questions that can be openly discussed in the context of supervision.
Torre says mutually agreed-upon goals are discussed and reviewed in weekly supervisory meetings in her practice. Note that when you serve as both clinical supervisor and employer, be mindful of the dual relationship. Some practices separate these roles — having one person provide clinical supervision while another handles administrative performance reviews. If your practice outsources your clinical supervision, you’ll have to find other ways to support and have these feedback conversations.
Structured reviews with licensed clinicians
Carve out planned times to review clinical performance. These meetings could occur annually, more frequently as part of ongoing clinical meetings, or a combination of both. APA recommendations on supervision suggest having defined competencies (knowledge, skills, attitudes, values) that have observable evidence to them and can be discussed. They emphasize it’s important to measure what the clinician does, not who they are. The business metrics can be reviewed as well.
Some research shows that these conversations should balance performance accountability with professional development. Ideally, this shouldn’t just be a review of metrics — it should feel like a supportive conversation that discusses performance, but also highlights growth of the employee and ways the leadership team can support them. One major challenge with this structured approach includes making licensed, independent clinicians feel micro-managed and disrespected. Practice owners like Torre and others are keenly aware of this and shape the culture of their practice accordingly.
Responsive approach to licensed clinicians
Torre emphasizes autonomy while providing as much support as possible. She monitors performance in the background by tracking clinical metrics and by staying relationally connected to the team in an ongoing way.
“Stay plugged into your team,” she says, explaining she’ll have conversations about performance in response to seeing metrics slipping or clinicians struggling. She recommends framing this as a question about how the clinician is doing and if they need support. This approach can work well for licensed and independent clinicians.
Other organizations take a less formalized and more responsive approach to reviewing performance. One risk of this approach is that important issues may slip through the cracks without regular check-ins.